Achieving the SDGs in Extraordinary Times

16/7/22

 The start of the “Decade of Action” to achieve the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has also marked the start of an unprecedented period of overlapping crises.

The Covid-19 pandemic and crises of conflict, hunger, climate change and environmental degradation are mutually compounding, pushing millions into acute poverty, health, and food insecurity. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has further disrupted supply chains and brought spikes in food and fuel prices.

A region at risk

The devastation caused by efforts to control the spread of Covid-19 across the Asia-Pacific region is now well documented. At least 90 million people have likely fallen into extreme poverty, and more than 150 million and 170 million people are under the poverty lines of US$3.20 and $5.50 a day, respectively.

The pandemic drove home the consequences of uneven progress on the SDGs and exposed glaring gaps in social protection and health-care systems. The dynamics of recovery in Asia and the Pacific have been shaped by access to vaccination and diagnostics, as well as by the structure and efficacy of national economies and public health systems.

Yet for all the economic contraction, greenhouse gas emissions in the Asia-Pacific region continued largely unabated, and the long-burning climate crisis continues to rage.

The positive effects of producing less waste and air pollution, for example, have been short-lived. Action lags, even as many countries in Asia and the Pacific have committed to scale up the ambition of their climate action and pursue a just energy transition. The political and economic drive to move away from fossil fuels remains weak, even with soaring prices of oil and gas across the region.

As the Ukraine conflict drives greater uncertainty and exacerbates food and fuel shortages, leading to surging prices, security is increasingly at the center of economic and political priorities.

This confluence of issues is adding to the shocks already dealt with by the pandemic and triggering crises of governance in some parts of our region. Again, the poorest and most vulnerable groups are the most affected.

Price pressures on everyday necessities like food and fuel are straining household budgets, yet governments will find it more difficult to step in this time. Government responses to the previous succession of shocks have reduced fiscal space while leaving heightened national debt burdens in their wake.

It has never been more important to ensure that the integrated aspects of economic, social, and environmental sustainability are built into our approaches to recovery.

As our joint ESCAP-ADB-UNDP 2022 report on Building Forward Together for the SDGs highlighted, despite important pockets of good practice, countries of Asia and the Pacific need to act much more decisively – and faster and at scale – on this imperative. This redefines what progress means and how it is measured, as development that promotes the well-being of the whole – people and planet.

Extraordinary agenda for extraordinary times

All this is a sobering backdrop for achieving the ambitious agenda of the SDGs. But these interlocking shocks are also a result of a failure to advance on the SDGs as an integrated agenda.

We need unconventional responses and investments that fundamentally change what determines sustainable development outcomes. Rather than treating our current looming crises of energy, food and human security as distinct, we must address their interlinkages.

To illustrate, a determined focus on fiscal reforms that deliver environmental and social benefits can generate big wins. Asia and the Pacific can lead with action on long-standing commitments to eliminate costly environmentally harmful subsidies, including for fossil fuels.

Some countries took advantage of reduced fossil-fuel consumption during the Covid-19 lockdowns and mobility restrictions to increase taxes on fuel to raise funds for recovery programs and provide health insurance and social protection for those least protected.

There are also opportunities to repurpose the estimated US$540 billion spent each year on global agricultural subsidies to promote more inclusive agriculture, and healthier and more sustainable systems of food production.

Better targeting smallholder farmers and rewarding good practices such as promoting shifts to regenerative agriculture can help transform food systems, restore ecosystems, and protect biodiversity.

Just transitions

For our part, as UN agencies and multilateral organizations, we are committed to supporting countries to pursue just transitions to rapid decarbonization and climate resilience. Scaling up the deployment of greener renewables will be key to meeting energy security needs.

Similarly, the current food crisis must be a catalyst for an urgent transition to more sustainable, locally secure food production and markets. Agricultural practices that foster local resilience, adopt nature-based solutions while increasing efficiencies, and support climate mitigation practices can strengthen long-term food security.

The SDGs test resolves and require us to address the difficult trade-offs of recovery. To emerge from interlinked crises of energy, food and fiscal space, we must accelerate the transformations needed to end poverty and protect the planet.

We must ensure that by 2030 all people, not just a few, enjoy a greater level of peace and prosperity.

The UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), the Asian Development Bank and the UN Development Program will host a side event at the High-Level Political Forum for Sustainable Development on July 12, 2022, that will explore these themes further.

Chia sẻ bài viết ^^
Other post

All comments [ 20 ]


The free Wind 16/7/22 16:44

The Human Development Index (HDI) was estimated to suffer a steep and unprecedented decline” in 2020 for the first time in the 30 years since the measure has been computed.

LawrenceSamuels 16/7/22 16:46

The COVID-19 pandemic threatens to affect low and medium human development countries disproportionately with potentially devastating impacts on the three dimensions of the Human Development Index – health, education and standard of living

Gentle Moon 16/7/22 16:48

Because of the pandemic, there could be between 41 to 169 million people in extreme poverty by 2030 in countries with low and medium
levels of human development, including 20 and 83 million women and girls.

Voice of people 16/7/22 16:49

The benefits of the ‘SDG Push’ scenario also extend to other SDGs in the People’s pillar.

Vietnam Love 16/7/22 16:57

Due to COVID-19, an unprecedented health, economic and social crisis is threatening lives and livelihoods, making the achievement of Goals even more challenging

yobro yobro 16/7/22 16:59

With an ‘SDG Push’, by 2030 countries categorised as low and medium human development could make significant gains relative to the high human development group of countries for poverty, primary education, maternal and child mortality, and access to improved water sources.

Me Too! 16/7/22 17:00

Low and medium human development countries do not perform as well on the targets of reduction of malnourishment in people and
children secondary education and improved sanitation groups

Red Star 16/7/22 17:02

‘SDG Push’ still has a significant impact on access to improved water sources in low and medium human development countries

John Smith 16/7/22 17:03

Eleven medium and high human development countries that would not have achieved the SDG target on extreme poverty because of COVID-19’s impact could reach it by 2030 with the SDG Push scenario.

For A Peace World 16/7/22 17:05

The ‘SDG Push’ scenario can not only help the world recover years of development progress that were lost because of the pandemic but also gain additional years in poverty eradication efforts

Robinson Jones 16/7/22 17:25

We estimate the number of years each country would gain in this new world towards the eradication of extreme poverty through targeted policy interventions and choices.

Kevin Evans 16/7/22 17:27

The estimate is by tracking any country’s progress in by 2030 under the ‘COVID Baseline’ scenario and comparing it to the year in which this poverty level is achieved under the ‘SDG Push’ scenario.

Duncan 16/7/22 17:28

Beyond the immediate gains of tackling extreme poverty with an integrated approach such as the SDG Push, countries with low and medium levels of human development stand to benefit significantly
beyond 2030.

Herewecome 16/7/22 17:29

the potential progressive effect of an integrated package of inclusive green growth policies as simulated by the ‘SDG Push’ scenario.

Jacky Thomas 16/7/22 17:31

No low human development country would achieve the global SDG target of eliminating extreme poverty by 2030, likely due to relatively high starting points in their extreme poverty rates.

Allforcountry 16/7/22 17:32

One year after a global pandemic was declared, much has been learned about SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, its biology, and its effects on people and societies.

Enda Thompson 16/7/22 17:35

Rich countries with arguably the best health
systems in the world suffered unspeakable death tolls.

Wilson Pit 16/7/22 17:37

One year on, the path of the COVID-19 pandemic is still unpredictable, and it will take years to register the magnitude of its socioeconomic impact fully

Egan 16/7/22 17:38

The impact is not equal across groups – low human development countries are estimated to benefit significantly more than countries in the medium human development group in terms of reducing poverty rate

Swift Hoodie 16/7/22 17:40

Even though many countries may not reach several of the SDG targets by 2030, a renewed focus on the 2030 Agenda in COVID-19 recovery efforts, through targeted integrated policies as simulated by the ‘SDG Push’ scenario, would bring them even closer to achievement than they would have been in their development trajectory prior to COVID-19

Your comments