People’s interests are the root of the law: senior lawmaker
16/8/17
Looking back at the past five years, it can be said the current legislature has
well fulfilled its role as the highest representative body of the people and
the highest state power body, attaining landmark achievements in its
activities, especially in exercising constitutional and legislative powers.
During its tenure, the National Assembly promulgated a new Constitution and 107
codes and laws, including seven laws to be passed at its upcoming and also last
session. That is not to mention 112 resolutions of the National Assembly and 10
ordinances of its Standing Committee. This is the largest number of codes and
laws ever passed in a single tenure during the 70-year history of the
Vietnamese National Assembly. The numbers of codes and laws passed by the Xth,
XIth and XIIth National Assembly were just 53,
84 and 67, respectively.
The enactment of the new Constitution in 2013 marks a special political-legal
event of not only the parliament but also the country as a whole. Drawing on
the values of the constitutional history crystallized in the previous
constitutions, adhering to the Political Platform of the Communist Party of
Vietnam, and closely following the practical realities and development
requirements of the country, the 2013 Constitution creates a new framework for
the building and strengthening of the socialist law-governed state, continued
development of the socialist-oriented market economy and comprehensive and deep
international integration.
As soon as the 2013 Constitution was enacted, the National Assembly took prompt
actions to put it into reality. A comprehensive plan on review, revision,
cancellation and release of legal documents in line with the Constitution was
elaborated. On that basis, the National Assembly adjusted its whole-term legislative
program and set legislative tasks and objectives for each year and each
session.
During this term, the National Assembly has promulgated many codes and laws
governing such important issues as organization of the state apparatus, human
rights and citizens rights; and economic, cultural and social activities. They
include the Law on Organization of the Government; the Law on Organization of
the National Assembly, the Law on Local Administration, the Penal Code, the
Criminal Procedure Code, the Civil Code, the Civil Procedure Code, the
Enterprise Law, the Investment Law, the Housing Law, the Land Law, the Vietnam
Maritime Code, to name but a few.
Constitutional and legislative activities of the current National Assembly have
basically met the requirements for pushing ahead reform of the organization and
operation of the state apparatus by the standards of a socialist law-governed
state; ensuring the respect for, guarantee and protection of human rights and
citizens’ rights; building and developing the socialist-oriented market economy
and deeper integration into the global economy. The outcomes of these
constitutional and legislative activities create a premise for the next
parliaments to further improve the legal system conducive to national development
in the new situation
Reforms in the legislative process have brought about impressive achievements
in the National Assembly’s legislative work.
Right from the early days of the term, the leaders, the Standing Committee and
agencies of the National Assembly have paid special attention to the research,
renewal and improvement of legislative activities. Every stage of the
legislative process has been renovated, leading to practical results. The
whole-term legislative agenda was developed on the basis of the implementation
plan of the 2013 Constitution and, as a result, was suitable to practice.
Annual legislative programs were prepared and adjusted in a timely manner,
closely following practical changes and developments.
Drafting agencies carried out policy making and policy analysis on the basis of
researches, evaluations and reviews in each relevant sector, which help provide
solid grounds for drafting bills.
The Ethnic Council and Committees of the National Assembly verified draft laws
in a proactive manner through independent survey and evaluation of the
practical situation and consultation of experts and stakeholders. Hence, they
were able to come up with more objective criticisms and evaluations in their
verification reports. In the course of writing and verifying draft laws, both
drafting and verifying agencies took the initiative in holding public
consultations on important issues, thus involving a lot of people in
legislative work. The diversification of forms and methods of public
consultation, especially the early publishing of draft laws on the e-portals of
the Government, National Assembly and drafting agencies, has increased the
effectiveness, publicity, transparency, democracy and prudence of legislative
work, while making the best use of the people’s intellect and attaining social
consensus right from the policymaking stage.
Drafting and verifying agencies also closely cooperated with one another from
the early stage and throughout the legislative process until the drafts were
finalized.
Positive changes were also made in the deliberation on draft laws within
National Assembly deputies’ delegations and groups and at plenary meetings,
creating more opportunities for deputies to give their inputs. National
Assembly deputies were also provided with adequate information and documents
for comparison and analysis of draft laws and, therefore, the quality of their opinions
on draft laws has been raised.
Though there is still room for improvement, legislative reforms which have been
carried out during this tenure are actually of great significance.
In fact, weaknesses in legislative work have existed over many legislatures and
different solutions have been implemented but their efficiency is not as
satisfactory as expected. During the past years, the Law Committee has put
forward many proposals aiming to raise the quality of draft laws. These
proposals focus on the following issues:
Firstly, it is necessary to strictly comply with the
Law on Promulgation of Legal Documents so as to restrict the adjustment of the
whole-term and annual legislative programs. We should include in the lawmaking
program only draft laws that fully meet the set requirements, such as adequate
explanation about the necessity of the draft, clear policy on matters to be
regulated, objectives to be attained, major contents of the draft, and
enforcement methods and roadmap. At the same time, it is a resolute requirement
to remove from lawmaking programs those drafts that exist in name only, their
urgency has not yet been proved and their policies remain unclear.
Secondly, the Law Committee has proposed restricting the
building of draft laws with a large scope of regulation and draft laws that
regulate too many relations. We should instead elaborate and pass laws with a
narrow scope of regulation, focusing on some specific relations so as to ensure
its practicality and feasibility and limit the issuance of implementing
regulations. Reality shows that the fewer chapters and articles a law has, the
more easily it can be applied and revised given a developing and changing
society. Such small laws can be codified into big codes when conditions permit.
Thirdly, law enforcement review is key for ensuring the
feasibility of laws. Better review of the spheres governed by a law to
accurately identify matters arising in reality would help propose good policies
as a ground for revision of the law or issuance of a new one. So, in its
verification activities, the Law Committee has paid special attention to
analyzing and evaluating law enforcement review reports and assessment reports
on the possible impacts of the draft laws. Thorough and objective assessment of
these reports provides an important basis for making verification reports and
recommending the drafting agencies to adjust policies and contents of the draft
laws.
Fourthly, in order to raise the quality of draft laws,
the verifying agency should carry out independent theoretical researches and
field surveys so as to obtain grounds for discussing and criticizing the
assessment reports of the drafting agencies. Consultations with experts and the
community must be regarded as an important information channel for listening
to, exchanging and receiving opinions in all stages of the legislative process.
The drafting and verifying agencies must rely on the people to make laws and
apply flexible methods and forms for mobilizing the intellect and experience of
the people of all strata in drafting laws. Only by doing so, can the law really
become a legal form of life, originate from life, and serve civil life, civil
rights and democracy.
The first lesson is in all times and circumstances, legislative activities must
strictly and thoroughly comply with the Constitution. Constitutional supremacy
is a fundamental requirement of the rule of law and a cornerstone principle of
lawmaking activities. The Constitution’s provisions are the basis for drafting
laws and a criterion for assessing the legality of a specific law. Therefore,
drafting and verifying agencies as well as lawmakers must discuss and pass laws
on the basis of the Constitution and compare the provisions of the draft laws
against those of the Constitution to make decision.
The second lesson is the people’s interests are the root of the law. All draft
laws must stem from the will and aspirations of people, aiming at the
objectives of respecting, guaranteeing and protecting lawful rights and
interests of the people. Relying on the people, listening to them, learning
experience from them, and drawing on their intellect and creativeness
constitute basic conditions for having a law of the people, by the people and
for the people.
The third lesson is to promote renovation and creativeness in all stages of the
legislative process. It is a must to adhere to the constitutional principles
and ensure the consistency and synchrony of the legal system, while
continuously renewing legal thinking and performance of lawmaking methods and
procedures to make legal provisions not only truly reflect the reality and keep
abreast of the changing circumstances but also drive future development.
The fourth lesson is cooperation and criticism between drafting and verifying
agencies are decisive to the quality of all draft laws. Bringing into play the
initiative and sharing of information and ideas on each draft law between these
agencies can make the law comprehensive and objective, winning the consent and
support of the affected entities when it is passed.
The fifth lesson is the quality and efficiency of a law much depend on the
role, capacity and political responsibility of every National Assembly deputy
for the interests of voters and the nation. So, attention should be paid throughout
a term of the National Assembly to enhancing the lawmaking capacity of National
Assembly deputies. They should be equipped with not only lawmaking knowledge
and skills but also sufficient information and materials on draft laws as well
as necessary expert assistance. To raise their lawmaking capacity, National
Assembly deputies should keep close contact with voters at the grassroots so as
to reflect the people’s needs in the laws in the most creative manner.
Finally, the role of the press and communication should be brought into full
play in legislative activities of the National Assembly. The media make
legislative work lively, transparent and democratic.
All comments [ 0 ]
Your comments