Facebook in particular has faced harsh criticism in recent weeks for its decision to
leave up posts from the president that many advocates said clearly incited
violence.
In the May post, Trump referred to protesters as
“THUGS” and wrote, “Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the
looting starts, the shooting starts.”
Facebook keeps telling critics that it is doing everything
it can to rid its service of hate, abuse and misinformation. And the company’s
detractors keep not buying it.
On Tuesday, CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Chief Operating
Officer Sheryl Sandberg met with a group of civil rights leaders, including the
organizers of a growing advertising boycott over hate speech on Facebook. One
of those leaders, NAACP President Derrick Johnson, said Facebook’s executives
offered little but cheap talk that skirted major commitments to new rules or
actions that would curb racism and misinformation on its platform.
“We’ve watched the conversation blossom into
nothingness,” Johnson said. “They lack the cultural sensitivity to understand
that their platform is actually being used to cause harm. Or, they understand
the harm their platform is causing and they’ve chosen to take the profit.”
The NAACP was one of several groups that sent
Facebook a list of 10 demands for policy change. Those included hiring a civil
rights executive; banning private groups that promote white supremacy, vaccine
misinformation or violent conspiracy theories; and ending an exemption that
allows politicians to post voting misinformation.
Such calls have the support of big-name companies
like Coca-Cola and Unilever who have yanked their Facebook ads in recent days.
But nothing concrete will change for Facebook’s 2.6 billion users.
Facebook did agree to install a civil rights vice
president, but didn’t say how long that would take, Jessica J. González — the
co-CEO of Free Press, a group behind the boycott — told The Associated Press.
President Donald Trump frequently skirts Facebook’s
posting rules, yet faces no consequences, dismaying both civil rights leaders
and some of Facebook’s own employees. The president made several misleading
claims about mail-in-voting in May and June posts, including one that pushed a
far-fetched theory that foreign countries plan to print millions of bogus
ballots. Trump also used the platform to threaten violence against racial
injustice protesters in Minneapolis when he wrote “when the looting starts, the
shooting starts” in a May post.
The posts have gone unchecked on Facebook. Twitter,
meanwhile, has fact checked, removed or obscured some of Trump’s controversial
tweets.
“When a politician, no matter who that politician
is, when he makes a post that says ‘shoot the looters,’ it is not only racially
insensitive, it could incite violence across the country,” Johnson said.
Last month, Facebook announced it would begin
labeling rule-breaking posts — even from politicians — going forward. But it is
not clear if Trump’s previous controversial posts would have gotten the label.
On Wednesday, Facebook will release the final
results of its own “civil rights audit” of its U.S. practices.
The audit was led by former American Civil Liberties
Union executive Laura Murphy, who was hired by Facebook in May 2018 to assess
its performance on vital social issues.
More than 900 companies have joined the ad boycott,
which runs through the end of July, although some companies plan to withhold
their ad dollars for longer.
In a Facebook post Tuesday, Sandberg emphasized what
she called the company’s years of effort to “minimize the presence of hate” on
Facebook and the billions of dollars it has spent “to find and remove hate — as
well as protect the integrity of our platform more generally.”
Facebook’s 2019 revenue was more than $70 billion,
nearly all of it from advertising.
Facebook’s inaction will only encourage companies to
continue their boycott of advertising on the site for longer, said Jonathan
Greenblatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League.
“The list is growing every day,” Greenblatt said of companies joining the boycott. “It’s unfortunate to go back to them and say we haven’t seen the progress we expected.”./.
All comments [ 20 ]
Criticism of Facebook has led to international media coverage and significant reporting of its legal troubles and the outsize influence it has on the lives and health of its users and employees, as well on its influence on the way media, specifically news, is reported and distributed.
The use of Facebook can have psychological effects, including feelings of jealousy and stress, a lack of attention, and social media addiction, in some cases comparable to drug addiction.
Facebook has come under scrutiny for 'ignoring' or shirking its responsibility for the content posted on its platform, including copyright and intellectual property infringement, hate speech, incitement of rape and terrorism, fake news, Facebook murder, crimes, and violent incidents live-streamed through its Facebook Live functionality.
Facebook has been banned by several governments for various reasons, including Syria,China, and Iran but not in Vietnam. Is the country a free land for free speech?
I’m deeply disappointed that Facebook still refuses to hold itself accountable to its users, its advertisers and society at large.
Yes, it is a freak of so-called human rights and democracy values of Western-style!
The company still allows too much racist, hateful, and violent content to spread on its social media network — and that company executives gave PR “spin” rather than meaningful solutions.
In light of recent protests against racial injustice in the US, Facebook is facing a renewed reckoning over how it handles hate speech on its platform.
Critics say the company’s own executives have held back this progress because they have failed to commit to concrete fixes or timelines.
Let's boycott Facebook now!
Many groups denounced how Zuckerberg “offered the same old defense of white supremacist, anti-Semitic, islamophobic, and other hateful groups” that it has “heard too many times before.”
Facebook’s struggles in handling hate speech and misinformation on its platform date back a long time. Many have argued the company’s policies and inaction have contributed to the genocide against the Rohingya people in Myanmar, exacerbated political polarization in the lead-up to the 2016 US presidential election, and facilitated the growth of violent extremist groups like the boogaloo movement in the US.
Many politicians, including President Trump, have made unfounded accusations that Facebook and other social media platforms have an anti-conservative bias.
The Facebook data privacy scandal centers around the collection of personally identifiable information of "up to 87 million people" by the political consulting and strategic communication firm Cambridge Analytica.
Facebook has more than a decade-long track record of incidents highlighting inadequate and insufficient measures to protect data privacy.
If they don’t actually do anything it’s like going to the doctor, getting a new set of recommendations about your diet, doing nothing about it and then wondering why you’re not any healthier.
We’re tired, we’re tired of the dialogue because the stakes are so incredibly high for our communities. We’re seeing Facebook fail to meet the moment.
Facebook’s ambition and size has attracted scrutiny not just from civil rights leaders but also from lawmakers worried about the power tech platforms wield in the marketplace.
Mark is setting a very dangerous precedent for other voices who would say similar harmful things on Facebook.
The UN warned of the rise of hate speech in Assam being spread via social media — saying this is contributing to increasing instability and uncertainty for millions in the region.
Your comments