Harvard University sued for discriminating against Asian-American students
25/10/18
The Justice Department confirmed
last week that it is examining claims of racial discrimination
against Asian Americans in university admissions. It is possible that this will
result in investigations and lawsuits targeting our nation’s most competitive
schools.
In an intense legal
battle over the role of race in Harvard University's admissions policies, a
group that is suing the school says Harvard lowers the rankings of
Asian-American applicants in a way that is unconstitutional.
The Students for Fair
Admissions says Harvard uses "racial balancing" as part of its
formula for admitting students and that the practice is illegal. In response, Harvard says the group is misinterpreting data that the
highly competitive school shared about how it chooses students.
Harvard consistently rated Asian-American
applicants lower than others on traits like “positive personality,” likability,
courage, kindness and being “widely respected,” according to an analysis of
more than 160,000 student records filed Friday by a group representing
Asian-American students in a lawsuit against the university.
Asian-Americans scored higher than applicants
of any other racial or ethnic group on admissions measures like test scores,
grades and extracurricular activities, according to the analysis commissioned
by a group that opposes all race-based admissions criteria. But the students’
personal ratings significantly dragged down their chances of being admitted,
the analysis found.
The court documents, filed in federal court in
Boston, also showed that Harvard conducted an internal investigation into its
admissions policies in 2013 and found a bias against Asian-American applicants.
But Harvard never made the findings public or acted on them.
Citing a 2013 analysis by Harvard's Office of
Institutional Research, the SFFA said in a federal court filing on Friday that
if academics were the only criterion, Asian-American students would have made
up more than 43 percent of students who were admitted, rather than the actual
18.7 percent.
Even if other criteria — such as legacy
students, athletic recruiting and extracurricular and personal attributes — are
included, the plaintiffs say, the number of Asian-Americans at Harvard would
still have risen to more than 26 percent.
Saying that the admission rate for whites
outpaced that of Asian-Americans over a 10-year period — despite outperforming
them in only the "personal" ratings — the plaintiffs allege that
"being Asian American actually decreases the chances of admissions."
In a statement,
Harvard said on Friday that a full analysis of the data shows the school
"does not discriminate against applicants from any group, including
Asian-Americans, whose rate of admission has grown 29 percent over the last
decade."./.
All comments [ 0 ]
Your comments