In 2021, several military and political events took place across the globe resulting from the strategic rivalry between major powers, making the world situation more instable and unpredictable.
Ending the 20-year anti-terrorism war in Afghanistan
On August 15, 2021, soon after President Joe Biden’s decision to withdraw U.S troops from Afghanistan, Taliban, once hunted by Washington in its global war on terrorism, took control of the country right after American last troops left the city of Kabul. In addition, Biden also decreased the number of troops in the Middle East, keeping only the necessary ones to deter international terrorist networks, contain the “invasion” of Iran and protect important interests of the U.S. In his announcement, Biden stated that U.S withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and the Middle East marked the end of an era in which the United States uses military power to remake other countries. Francis Fukuyama – an economic professor of Johns Hopkins University (US) who claimed that the 21st Century will be America’s era after the collapse of the USSR in 1991, had to admit that U.S withdrawal of troops bogged down in foreign theatres signaled not the recession but the end of the U.S hegemony.
U.S adjustments in military policy
U.S military policy under Biden’s administration is shaped and implemented basing on the “Interim National Security Strategic Guidance” released on 3 March, 2021 which predicted that US is confronting changes in world power balance with growing competition from China and Russia who are pursuing their influences on regional and international scales. Implementing this Guidance, the Pentagon makes adjustments of the scale, structure and capability of the U.S military and resolutely discards the old weapon systems to spare resources for the development of new technologies to make sure that the U.S military is always best trained and equipped in the world. America will not hesitate to use force if necessary to protect its vital national interests. However, Washington only uses it as the last resort and puts on top political, diplomatic and economic measures. The U.S military doctrine with a vision to 2030 stipulates that America will regain its superiority in high-tech conventional weapons, such as: hypersonic and artificial intelligence (AI) weapons, and will reduce the role of nuclear weapon.
Fragile strategic stability in the U.S – Russia relations
After the Geneva summit on June 16th 2021 between U.S President Joe Biden and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, the two sides issued a joint statement about strategic stability which necessitates the maintenance of strategic predictability in the relations between U.S and Russia as both countries are nuclear powers in terms of their arsenals, technological level and the quality of nuclear warheads. Both countries are aware of the mutual assured destruction in a nuclear war, therefore, President Joe Biden decided to extend the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) and facilitate talks to reach new agreements on arms control. Nevertheless, the strategic stability in the U.S – Russia relations is hard to last long because of their discords in the settlement of the “flashpoints”, such as: the Syrian Civil War and Ukraine Crisis. As for Ukraine issue, the U.S commits to back President Volodymyr Zelensky’s use of force to “retake” Crimea and “liberate” two eastern provinces of Lugansk and Donersk. Therefore, in 2021, U.S and NATO conducted the “Sea Breeze 2021” exercise in the Black Sea with the participation of its 6th Fleet and 30 NATO member countries.
China becoming the No. 1 rival of the U.S
After coming to office in January 2021, President Joe Biden marked a fundamental change in the U.S – China relations. The Interim National Security Strategic Guidance stated that China is the only competitor potentially capable of combining its economic, diplomatic, military, and technological power to mount a sustained challenge to a stable and open international system. For this reason, President Joe Biden advocates the establishment of an ally of world democratic countries to cope with challenges from China. To implement his vision, Biden upgraded his predecessor Donald Trump’s policy of strategic competition with Beijing into an anti-China doctrine, making the biggest change in its foreign policies during the past 5 decades since President Richard Nixon’s visit to Beijing in 1972. Competition with China is also one of the U.S reasons for holding Geneva summit, aimed at undermining the bond or even separating Russia from China.
NATO's efforts to escape from a “brain death”
With an attempt to save NATO from a “brain death” (under Trump’s presidency), in his voyage to Europe, President Joe Biden attended and directed the agenda of NATO’s summit held on June 14th 2021 in Brussels with a view to consolidating and strengthening the bloc’s solidarity. With high consensus, the summit issued a communiqué and, for the first time in history, NATO designated China a “systematic challenge” to the Western alliance. Also at the summit, NATO leaders agreed on the NATO-2030 agenda which assessed the present and future security environment, set out NATO’s approaches to regional and global security issues as well as long term security goals, and shaped its political and military vision in the next decade. At the same time, it pointed out the nature and main tasks to build and develop the alliance’s military forces in order to deal with new security challenges. Accordingly, to adapt with new political and security environment, NATO 2030 agenda pointed out 3 main directions for the alliance, namely: (1). Strengthening and maintaining military might by increasing investment in the modernisation of forces, affirming that security is the foundation for the prosperity of member countries; (2). Building a political convergence when evaluating issues relating to the interests of the allies, such as: situation at the “flashpoints”, global arms control, and impact of climate change; (3). Building a more global approach. If in the past two decades, the globalisation of the alliance’s function was for its need to expand influence beyond its regional boundaries and anti-terrorism, its globalisation of function now stems from the threats posed by an increasingly assertive China at a global scale. Hence, the preservation of values and democratic institutions to 2030 requires that NATO further strengthen its relations with non-Europe allies, such as: Australia, New Zealand, South Korea and Japan in areas of: aerospace, cyber space, and new technologies and arms control. This is not a global presence but a global approach of the alliance.
U.S strengthening relations with non-NATO allies and partners
Under the Interim National Security Strategic Guidance, stemming from its vital interests, the U.S pays special attention to strengthening relations with allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific region. Accordingly, America will deepen the relations with India, New Zealand, Singapore and other ASEAN countries. In the Western hemisphere, America will widen relations with Canada and Mexico. In the Middle East, America will consolidate and strengthen relations with its allies and partners to contain Iran. To strengthen relations with non-NATO allies and partners, in March 2021, U.S Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin and Secretary of State Antony Blinken conducted their first visit to Japan. The joint statement after US-Japan talk expressed concerns over China’s activities in the East Sea and East China Sea that are inconsistent with the international rules-based order and create political, economic, military and technological threats. On September 15, 2021, U.S President Joe Biden, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced the launch of a trilateral security partnership, known as AUKUS, to deepen diplomatic, security and defence relations in the Indo-Pacific region to meet challenges of the 21st Century. The US-UK-Australia Joint Statement stated that AUKUS is guided by enduring ideals and shared commitment to the international rules-based order, and is a mechanism to strengthen the trilateral security partnership. Accordingly, the US, the UK, and Australia resolve to deepen diplomatic, security, and defence cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region. Through AUKUS, the three governments will strengthen the ability of each to support security and defence interests, building on longstanding and ongoing bilateral ties; promote deeper information and technology sharing; foster deeper integration of security and defense-related science, technology, industrial bases, and supply chains. And in particular, the three countries will significantly deepen cooperation on a range of security and defense capabilities. One of the commitments made in the AUKUS is that the U.S and UK will support Australia in acquiring nuclear-powered submarines for the Royal Australian Navy. AUKUS demonstrates the U.S determination in coping with growing threats to the freedom of navigation in the East Sea, where key sea lines of communication pass through.
In brief, several political and military events took place in 2021 around the world, making situation even more complex. This is also the result of adjustments and competition between regional and global major powers, greatly affecting each country, region and the world as a whole.
All comments [ 20 ]
A potent mix of hope and fear accompanies the start of 2021 in most of the world. Scientists have created several vaccines for a disease that didn’t even have a name this time last year. But many countries, including the UK and the US, are still stumbling through the deadliest period of the pandemic.
The shadow of Covid did not begin to lift, even in richer countries, for months.
The rebuilding of economies shattered by Covid everywhere will be slow; even countries that managed to contain it have taken a hit, from Vietnam to New Zealand.
when the immediate threat is over, the world will face other major challenges that in a normal year would have dominated the headlines.
Most urgent – though not always seen as such by politicians – is the climate crisis.
Wildfires and extreme weather have focused attention on the costs of a warming world, and the narrowing window to cut emissions and prevent catastrophic global heating.
America is divided, its fragile democracy in need of repair. And the climate crisis cries out for leadership.
What began as “alternative facts” at the start of the Trump administration could develop into “alternative realities” under Biden, fuelling hyperpartisanship in Washington and rendering the country almost ungovernable.
With Brexit done and dusted largely to the EU’s satisfaction, Covid vaccination under way and a more amicable – and predictable – US president in the White House, 2021 should by rights be an easier year for Europe.
Add to that the need – in the aftermath of a pandemic – to take unpopular steps to tackle the climate crisis; a disputed drive for a common European defence and security policy.
There are huge problems – the devastating impact of Covid on communities and economies, growing insecurity in many regions, and environmental crises – and big questions are being asked by hundreds of millions of young people about their futures.
Last year began badly, with Beijing’s attempts to cover up the coronavirus outbreak causing reputational damage which wasn’t fixed by later attempts to rebuild bridges with masks, PPE, and vaccines.
Regional neighbours will watch the continuing military buildup and threats to disputed islands in the South China Sea and to Taiwan.
Israel set to hold its fourth general election in the space of two years as a protracted political crisis barrels in 2021.
Latin America’s most polarising ruler, the Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro, faces a crunch year in 2021 – the third of his four-year term
In 2021, this support sustained investigative work into offshore wealth, spyware, sexual harassment, labour abuse, environmental plunder, crony coronavirus contracts, and Big Tech.
The new year, like all new years, will hopefully herald a fresh sense of cautious optimism, and there is certainly much for us to focus on in 2022 - a volley of elections, myriad economic challenges, the next round in the struggle against the pandemic and a World Cup.
With no shareholders or billionaire owner, we can set our own agenda and provide trustworthy journalism that’s free from commercial and political influence, offering a counterweight to the spread of misinformation.
When it’s never mattered more, we can investigate and challenge without fear or favour.
Greater numbers of people can keep track of global events, understand their impact on people and communities, and become inspired to take meaningful action.
Your comments