Japan in the South China Sea disputes
27/8/14
The East and South China Seas are the scene of escalating territorial disputes
between China and its
neighbors, including Japan, Vietnam, and the Philippines.
There are various reasons for this
activity. Japan’s
principal security interest in Southeast Asia
is the safety and security of regional sea lanes. As tensions have ratcheted up in
the South China Sea over the past several years, Japan has expressed growing concern
at negative developments and the lack of progress in implementing effective
conflict management mechanisms. Japan
is not a claimant, but as a major maritime trading nation it is a significant
stakeholder in the dispute. Tokyo is alarmed at China’s increasingly assertive posture in the
maritime domain, and views the disputes in the South and East China Seas as linked.
Japan has two major concerns over the South
China Sea. First, that instability has the potential to disrupt
the free flow of maritime trade
on which the
country’s economic prosperity depends. Second, that if China is able to
persuade or coerce other Asian nations into accepting its claimed “historic
rights” in the South China Sea, existing international legal norms such as the
1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea would be undermined. This
could dilute Japan's claim
to ownership of the Senkaku Islands (which China
calls the Diaoyus) in the East China Sea, if Beijing decides to use similar arguments.
To mitigate its concerns, Japan is
pursuing a number of strategies: it raises the problem at regional security
forums; it tries to encourage ASEAN unity on issues of maritime security; it
discusses the problem bilaterally with Southeast Asian countries and provides
capacity building support to selected claimants (principally the Philippines);
and it seeks closer ties with other external stakeholders which share its
concerns like United States and other countries.
It's significant that Japan is willing to antagonize China over a territorial dispute in which Tokyo has no direct stake (notwithstanding its own,
separate territorial frictions with Beijing).
Tokyo has always kept an eye on the South China Sea, but it was not until tensions began to
ramp up after 2008 that it felt the need to take a more proactive approach to
the dispute. It's now going to the next level by directly confronting China.
Despite these
accomplishments, there is still one glaring shortcoming in Japan’s effort to strengthen its position in
ASEAN: namely, its position on the Diaoyu/Senkaku Island dispute with China.
Dropping its currently policy and embracing international law would
significantly benefit both Japan
and Southeast Asia.
Japan’s current policy also imperils ASEAN nations in their
own disputes with China over
various features in the South China Sea. To
begin with, by refusing to acknowledge that a dispute exists over the Senkakus,
Japan is helping to
legitimize China’s refusal
to acknowledge any disputes over features it controls in the South
China Sea. By dropping its current Senkaku policy and appealing to
international law to settle the dispute, Japan
would be making China’s
current positions on the South China Sea issue
even more untenable. Beijing would be even more
isolated in not acknowledging certain disputes as well as refusing to use
international law and multilateral forums to peacefully resolve the various
disputes in the China
Seas.
Acknowledging the dispute and seeking international
arbitration would be a clear demonstration of the kind of leadership role Japan wants to play in Asia.
International arbitration could very well help reduce tensions in the region.
Moreover, it would not only benefit Japan
itself, but also strengthen ASEAN nations’ positions vis-à-vis China in the South China
Sea.
All comments [ 0 ]
Your comments