U.S. recognition of opposition leader may bring the world a new humanitarian crisis
24/1/19
Venezuelan opposition
leader Juan Guaido has
declared himself the country’s interim president, winning support from
Washington, prompting the beleaguered socialist Nicolas
Maduro to sever diplomatic ties with the US.
President Trump was
among the first leaders in the Americas to recognise Mr Guaido’s claim to the
presidency, tweeting that the Venezuelan people “have suffered for too long at
the hands of the illegitimate Maduro regime”. The US president’s remarks were swiftly
followed by similar statements from Canada and right-leaning Latin
American governments, including Venezuela’s neighbours Brazil and Colombia.
The recognition came
after Mr Guaido told a rally in the capital Caracas that Mr Maduro had usurped
power, and he promised to create a transitional government that would help
the country escape its hyperinflationary economic collapse.
Soon after, Canada,
Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Peru, Ecuador, Argentina, Paraguay and Costa Rica said
they would follow suit – although Mexico’s left-leaning government said there
would be no change of policy for now and Bolivia’s president, Evo Morales,
attacked what he called an imperialist assault on South America’s right to
democracy and self-determination.
In response to Mr
Guaido’s claims and the international response, Mr Maduro – who began a second
term in office on 10 January following a widely boycotted election last year –
accused the opposition of seeking to stage a coup with the support of the
United States, which he said was seeking to govern Venezuela from Washington.
He also announced he
was cutting diplomatic ties with the US and gave American diplomatic
personnel 72 hours to leave the country.
Speaking from the
presidential palace to a crowd of red-shirted supporters, Mr Maduro said the US
was making a “grave mistake”, and noted that countries including Guatemala,
Brazil, Chile, and Argentina had all seen their leftist governments toppled
during the Cold War with the help of American intervention.
“The imperial
government of the United States is leading a coup attempt against us in order
to install a puppet presidency that they can control in Venezuela,” Mr Maduro
raged. “Before the people and nations of the world, and as constitutional
president ... I have decided to break all political and diplomatic relations
with the US. Get out! Leave Venezuela. We have (our) dignity dammit!”
Mr Guaido, meanwhile,
has received praise from a host of western allies after vowing to hold
legitimate elections “and to re-establish the constitution we need the
agreement of all Venezuelans”.
The declaration
takes Venezuela into uncharted territory, with the possibility of the
opposition now running a parallel government recognised abroad as legitimate
but without control over state functions.
Mr Trump’s recognition
of Mr Guaidó as acting president comes after vice president Mike Pence penned
an opinion article expressing support for the opposition. Mr Pence wrote
that the United States stands with the protesters standing up in opposition to
Mr Maduro.
“Nicolas Maduro has no
legitimate claim to power,” Mr Pence wrote in The Wall Street Journal.
“Nicolás Maduro must go.”
But, Mr Maduro retained
support from other countries in the western hemisphere, including from
Bolivia’s leftist president, Evo Morales, who affirmed his alliance with the
Maduro government on Wednesday and tweeted in solidarity against the
United States’ attempts to meddle in the affairs of South American countries.
“Our solidarity with
the Venezuelan people and our brother Nicolas Maduro, in these decisive hours
in which the claws of imperialism seek again to mortally wound the democracy
and self-determination of the peoples of South American”, Mr Morales
tweeted.
But as the dramatic
news sunk in, Venezuela specialists
said they were unsure what the immediate impact might be – and how Maduro might
react.
“We are defending the
right to the very existence of our Bolivarian Republic,” Maduro said, accusing
his foes of trying to steal Venezuela’s oil, gas and gold: “They intend to
govern Venezuela from Washington. Do you want a puppet government controlled by
Washington?”
Beyond breaking ties
with the US, many now expect Maduro to order the arrest of Guaidó or other
opposition leaders. Farnsworth said Maduro might also “turn sharpshooters on
crowds and try to scare everybody back home”.
If that happened, the
US and the international community would be forced to react. The US official
said it had “a host of options” if such a crackdown occurred: “Everything is on
the table – all options.”
Venezuela has
experienced a series of food and medicine shortages, as well as widespread
crime as the country’s economic woes have rendered the bolivar currency
virtually worthless. Thousands of Venezuelans have fled to neighbouring
countries to escape the economic crisis.
Increased economic
sanctions could exacerbate an already severe humanitarian emergency that the UN
says has created the biggest
migration crisis in recent Latin American history. A military
intervention that would potentially lead to massive destruction and great loss
of life and could drag the US into a messy and protracted occupation and
reconstruction process was also undesirable.
Smilde said: “Look at
Somalia, look at Afghanistan, look at Iraq: all of those cases were supposed to
be short military actions and actually what they do is end up generating
enormous costs in terms of loss of life and infrastructure.”
Venezuela was once
Latin America’s richest nation. Now inflation may reach 1 million
percent and a recent poll found
that 30 percent of Venezuelans eat only once a day.
Yes, the U.S. recognition
of opposition leaders may cause a serious humanitarian crisis for Venezuelan
people and turn the country into an Iraq or Afghanistan version 2.0./.
All comments [ 11 ]
Rather than continue along our current path of retreat, the country must dedicate itself to responding to—and preventing—global crises.
Today we face a global humanitarian crisis of epic proportions.
Over the past 15 years, 3.3 billion people—almost half of the world’s population—have been exposed to political violence. And still darker clouds loom on the horizon.
The United States has a long bipartisan history of global humanitarian leadership, stewarded by once-shared values. Yet this tradition is under threat.
Even during the vaunted days of the Obama administration, the US government denied families their right to asylum and supplied weapons that helped to fuel conflicts overseas.
he Trump administration is dragging the country even further from our humanitarian values—separating parents from their children at our southern border, boycotting meetings on the global refugee crisis, and requesting multibillion-dollar cuts to foreign aid.
The United States cannot turn its back on its global humanitarian commitments, and the American people must push back against efforts to do so.
Rather than continue along our current path of retreat, we need to embrace a new humanitarian grand strategy
we need a proactive policy for peace.
It is time to reverse these priorities and create an overarching strategy of violence reduction and conflict prevention.
we must build a 21st-century humanitarian-response system centered on dignity, local leadership, and innovation.
Your comments