Viet Nam Human Rights
»
Analysis-Comment
»
home
»
What the Refugee Crisis tells us about Western human rights values! (Part I)
What the Refugee Crisis tells us about Western human rights values! (Part I)
10/11/15
Just three years ago, the European Union basked in the glory of a Nobel Peace Prize and boasted of being a
tight-knit community bound by “European values” of democracy, diversity and
dignity.
By its own measure, the 28-nation club
is now looking decidedly less European and even less a union these days as it
grapples with the continent’s biggest refugee crisis since World
War II. Overwhelmed by the prospect
of granting refugee status to tens of thousands of West Asian Muslims, most
European countries have reacted by simple throwing their moral compass away.
Migrants and refugees streaming into Europe from Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia have presented European leaders and policymakers with their greatest challenge since the debt crisis. The International Organization for Migration calls Europe the most dangerous destination for irregular migration in the world, and the Mediterranean the world's most dangerous border crossing. Yet despite the escalating human toll, the European Union's collective response to its current migrant influx has been ad hoc and, critics charge, more focused on securing the bloc's borders than on protecting the rights of migrants and refugees. However, with nationalist parties ascendant in many member states, and concerns about Islamic terrorism looming large across the continent, it remains unclear if the bloc or its member states are capable of implementing lasting asylum and immigration reforms.
The manner in
which most countries of the Global North have responded to thousands of
Muslim refugees fleeing conflict hot-spots in the Middle
East raises deep questions about their liberal and democratic
credentials. Much of Europe but also Australia
and North America’s response to the
refugee crisis is discriminatory and borders on unstated racism. It is a
response that exposes their inability to be comfortable with idea of a
multi-racial, multi-religious democracy.
Since the end of World War II, these
countries owned the human rights narrative as a proprietary feudal asset. They
lectured the Global South on human rights. They used it as a tool of their
foreign and economic policy. They spoke passionately about the universalisation
of human rights. But in 2015, as refugees from West Asia stream into Europe, all these fine principles have been cast aside.
The Western media has conveniently
supported the narrative of their governments by calling the refugee crisis “a
migrant crisis” – terminology that, as Al Jazeera rightly noted, “dehumanises
and distances” the plight of people fleeing from violence. But why is the
debate over words so desperately important? Because European countries want to
escape all accountability under international law.
What’s the difference between a migrant and refugee?
Distinguishing migrants from asylum
seekers and refugees is not always a clear-cut process, yet it is a crucial
designation because these groups are entitled to different levels of assistance
and protection under international law.
An asylum seeker is defined as a
person fleeing persecution or conflict, and therefore seeking international
protection under the 1951 Refugee Convention on the Status of Refugees; a refugee is
an asylum seeker whose claim has been approved. However, the UN considers
migrants fleeing war or persecution to be refugees, even before they officially
receive asylum. (Syrian and Eritrean nationals, for example, enjoy prima facie
refugee status.). A refugee is a person who is outside the country of his
nationality and cannot return to it for ‘fear of persecution’ on grounds of
race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or
political opinion. This ‘fear’ must be ‘well-founded’ for the grant of refugee
status by international organisations like the UN. If the “fear of persecution”
is unfounded then a person who is seeking refugee status can be deported.
There is a civil war raging in large
tracts of Syria, Iraq and Libya. So under the UN definition,
all people ‘fleeing’ conflict hot-spots in West Asia and North
Africa are doing so ‘owing to well-founded fear of persecution’
and thus should be given refugee status. Especially since Western countries
cannot escape responsibility for engineering these bloody civil wars through
their regime change geo-politics.
An economic migrant, by contrast, is
person whose primary motivation for leaving his or her home country is economic
gain. The term "migrant" is seen as an umbrella term for all three
groups. (Said another way: all refugees are migrants, but not all migrants are
refugees.)
Europe is currently witnessing a mixed-migration phenomenon,
in which economic migrants and asylum seekers travel together. In reality,
these groups can and do overlap, and this gray area is frequently exacerbated
by the inconsistent
methods with which asylum applications are often processed across
the EU's twenty-eight member states.
Stunned by the scale of the refugee influx and shocked
by the prospect of granting refugee status to tens of thousands of West Asian
Muslims, European countries – most of whom are narrowly focused on ensuring
social cohesion – would rather call this a “migrant crisis” and stick to their
Fortress Europe immigration policies. Europe
wants to keep Muslim refugees out. They have done this simply by throwing their
moral compass away./. (To be continued)
Popular Posts
-
Religion is a part of the spiritual life in society, this phenomenon of the superstructure has been strongly changed with economic - social... -
Vietnam has just done well for the second cycle of Universal Periodical Review (UPR) in Geneva, Switzerland. So, what’s the UPR? an... -
Thai people in Shutdown Bangkok protests Not until this crisis, we have realized the ne... -
Representatives from foreign countries congratulate Viet Nam on its election to the Human Rights Council for the first time on November ... -
A street flowers vendor in Hanoi Another new spring has come to Vietnam, bring... -
If nothing changes, there will be a preferential credit program with hundreds of thousands billion of capital for agriculture and r... -
Recently, several anti-governmental individuals have established series of illegal groups and organizations in the name of civil soci... -
Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a private, nonprofit international broadcasting agency of the United States government that broadcasts and...
All comments [ 17 ]
European Union states "must share the responsibility for refugees seeking asylum, failing them will betray the bloc's values.
The UN human-rights commissioner has accused some European countries of a systematic violation of the human rights of migrants and refugees in order to deter them from coming to the countries.
It would be a disaster for Europe to go down that way!
Not some Love Peace, almost any European country is perfectly capable of saying, "Screw you, we're closing the borders".
According to credible reports from various sources, the violations of the human rights of migrants are neither isolated nor coincidental, but systematic.
It would also harm European trade and tourism, just as China's economic slowdown is hitting the global economy.
Offering protection to people fleeing systemic human rights violations is not an act of charity. It is a human rights imperative, a matter of legal and moral obligation. And, Western countries are going against their core values.
The refugee crisis is forcing Europe to consider whether it can live up to its own, self-proclaimed values. Unfortunately, the answer is likely to be "no".
European countries have turned their backs on their moral compass.
Refugees have right to seek and to enjoy asylum. It's a cornerstone of civilized world's human rights regime that is now not protected by European governments. So pathetic!
many people want to immigrate to the Europe with their hope of better life, but the reality is not they thought
they have to face many difficulties and challenges in the foreign land where they thought as a promised-land
it's awful to witness the tragic death of the refugees on the sea, including children
the refugees knew the adventure that they would have to face, but they had no other way
that's right, they were pushed into the deep end
the refugee crisis is the most serious challenge to the EU at present. that issue is threating to it's unity
If European countries refuse the refugees, they will be criticized for the inhumane
Your comments