The winner of the Economic Nobel Prize 2015: “The world is on the wrong way of giving aid”
30/10/15
Professor Angus Deanton,
Angus Deaton, the
Professor from Princeton
University and the owner
of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic
Sciences 2015, believes that the foreign aid brings more negative impacts than
the positive ones. This conflicting view
has turned him into “the enemy” of many people from the United Nations to Bill
Gates.
Deaton is now 69 years
old and he has been thought to be the winner of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for a long
time. However, the professor has been criticized strongly for his theory. “I
feel like being crashed by a “memory train””, he said. The security unit of Princeton university had to give him a “burner phone”
(kind of a cheap phone, equipped with a SIM card to use in a short time). Deaton has always been
strictly protected.
It has been 12 years since the last time a British
economist was awarded the Nobel Prize. The Nobel committee awarded him the
honor “for his analysis of consumption, poverty, and welfare”. His
work “linking detailed individual choices and aggregate outcomes” was
praised for having helped to “transform the fields of microeconomics,
macroeconomics, and development economics”. Nevertheless, the aspects that
close to the normal life, are important to Deaton’s success.
For example, in Deaton’s theory, the answer of the
question “how do people spend their money?” is to use a questionnaire to ask everyone
rather than finding a theoretical question from dozens of data of Government
statistics. This approach is considered a revolution.
He also found mistakes in
definition of the poor. There a simple truth that a poor person in the US could be a rich one living in the rural area
of India.
In recent years, these controversial views have attracted the public attention and turned
Deaton into “the enemy” of many people such as the UN, Bill Gates or Bono the
singer of U2 band.
In 2013, Deaton published the book named “the Great
Escape” which pointed out that the foreign aid is worthless. The donation of
giving money and food for poor people even hurts them.
After two year of protecting the book from the strong
public criticism, Deaton has always affirmed his rightness. And now with the
honor of the winner of the Nobel Prize, Deaton will have more basics to defend
his viewpoint.
“The problem is out of the prediction. Pouring money
into poor countries will negatively affect the political system in those
countries. On the other hand, people will stop paying the taxes if the basic
services are provided by the foreign aid”.
Deaton said that there are two effective ways to help
the poor countries’ people. First, moving to the country that needs help and
living and working there for advocating. Second, trying to persuade the Western
countries to change their commercial policies, to pay more for medicine and
strictly control the global trade of weapons.
"There are beautiful
girls come here and say 'I want to help the people of Rwanda’. I told them that just marrying
a coffee-raising farmer in Rwanda
and moving to live here. Then they said that they were unlikely to be able to
do so ".
Deaton is a big guy, he
has to use a walking stick. His wife, Mrs. Anne Case, is a colleague at Princeton university. She said that everyone hardly saw
him smile because there had been a matrix of ideas “dancing” in his brain.
Long before the French
economist, Thomas Piketty published his book about the gap between the rich and
poor, named “The imperialism in the 21st century”, Deaton had
studied about this aspect.
The Deaton’s viewpoint
might make people to the simplest measure of solving the global poverty is to
send the British army to conquer the undeveloped countries. Explaining this
point, Deaton said: “The poverty is not only about money, but also the social
position. The measure that I suggested is not to send the foreign army to
conquer any country. This is the thinking of the Scottish about the Britain
for a long time. I myself can realize it clearly because I had lived in this
process.”
“When you get older and
live in a world that has no definitions of the social welfare for the old, you
would realize that 1 million of dollars are not that much. When I were a boy
and study at Cambridge, if someone told me that I got a prize of 1 million of
dollars, I would think I will never have to work. However 1 million doesn’t
make me happy”, he said.
Reading and understanding
about the Deaton’s analysis of
consumption, poverty, and welfare will help us more understand about the ways that
capitalism are using to control the world. The ways that make the world turn to
bring benefits, special rights, privileges for the rich and the poor will live
in hardship and deprivation./.
All comments [ 0 ]
Your comments